Enverus to acquire SBS to power AI-driven utility planning and engineering

Enverus to acquire SBS to power AI-driven utility planning and engineering

AUSTIN, Texas (Mar. 4, 2026) —Enverus, the leading energy data analytics platform, announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Spatial Business Systems (SBS), an AI-enabled intelligent design automation platform for electric and gas utilities, telecommunications providers, and engineering teams.

To keep pace with load growth, reliability mandates, and grid modernization targets, utilities must deliver complex capital projects with speed and precision. The acquisition of SBS brings to Enverus a portfolio of design automation solutions and AI-powered reporting that streamlines utility engineering workflows with ready-made and fully customizable engineering templates, automated bills of materials and connected data across design, enterprise planning systems, and GIS environments.

“Utilities are projected to spend over $1 trillion by the end of 2029 to modernize aging infrastructure, integrate new generation, and meet rising demand,” said Manuj Nikhanj, CEO of Enverus. “The team at SBS has built mission-critical engineering tools that sit at the heart of utility capital programs. By combining their engineering design automation platform with Enverus’ planning intelligence and AI-driven analytics, we are building the operating platform for risk-adjusted utility capital deployment.”

Founded in 2002, SBS provides products across energy transmission, distribution, and substation design and telecommunications design: Automated Utility Design (AUD), Substation Design Suite (SDS), BIM Substation Designer (BSD), and Automated Broadband Designer (ABD). SBS solutions improve design cycle times by up to 90% and are widely adopted across utilities and engineering firms in North America, Europe, and Australia.

“We are proud of the trust our customers have placed in our products to automate and accelerate engineering design and improve project consistency,” said Al Eliasen, President and CEO of SBS. “Joining Enverus allows us to scale our innovation, expand our enterprise capabilities and embed richer data and analytics into the design process, just as utilities are being asked to do more with greater complexity than ever before.”

Enverus has expanded its power and energy transition solutions through rapid organic innovation and strategic acquisitions. The addition of SBS deepens Enverus’ role in utility capital programs and expands its ability to connect planning, design, market intelligence and asset optimization across the power ecosystem.

The transaction is expected to close in Q2, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals. Evercore and Barclays served as financial advisors to Enverus.

About Enverus
Enverus is the energy industry’s most trusted source for decision intelligence and operational efficiencies. With petabytes of proprietary data, deep domain expertise and AI-native technology, Enverus empowers customers to invest smarter, operate more efficiently, and scale faster — across upstream, midstream, minerals, power and renewables — all while navigating the most complex energy market in history. Learn more at www.enverus.com.

About SBS
Spatial Business Systems (SBS) is a provider of intelligent design tools for electric and gas utilities telecommunications providers. Its solutions enable utilities, telecoms, and engineering firms to automate detailed engineering design workflows, generate Bill of Materials, enforce standards and connect design to enterprise asset systems and GIS. SBS serves utilities, telecoms, and engineering partners globally and was backed by Peak Rock Capital.

Enverus Intelligence® Research Press Release - Haynesville operators calculate remaining growth

U.S. Strikes on Iran: Navigating Global Energy Market Volatility

Want to learn more about the impact of shut in production in the Middle East? About OPEC’s response to try and balance the market? Or about what this could mean for North American oil producers? Click here to learn more about Enverus Intelligence® Research (EIR) or to schedule a call with our analyst team if you’re already a customer.

Recent joint U.S.- Israeli military strikes in Iran and the ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region cast a significant shadow over global energy markets. As the world watches closely, the potential for regime change and the implications for oil and gas supply chains are paramount. This analysis from EIR delves into how these events could influence global energy balances, pricing, and market stability.

The Immediate Impact on Middle East Oil Production: Chokeholds and Premiums

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy trade, is at the forefront of concerns. Roughly one-third of global seaborne crude, about 14 MMbbl/d, passes through this vital waterway. Current market pricing appears to reflect a geopolitical premium of $10-$15/bbl. However, the potential for a prolonged disruption, even for just one month, could see Brent crude prices surge into triple digits.

Adding to this uncertainty, reported damage to Iran’s Kharg Island facility raises questions about the export capacity of roughly 2.0 MMbbl/d of Iranian crude. Should Kharg Island remain offline for an entire year, our 2026 Brent price forecast could see an additional $10-$15/bbl increase to our current $63/bbl projection.

History, however, offers a degree of perspective: conflict-driven price surges often prove temporary as governments and producers intervene to stabilize markets and offset supply losses. OPEC’s signaled incremental April increase in production is one such intervention, though it may not fully offset potential Iranian export disruptions, keeping focus on OPEC’s spare capacity.

Trade the facts, not the noise

Get energy fundamentals, price drivers and risk signals in your inbox bi-monthly.

Oil Market Dynamics and Inventory Buffers

While the immediate price reaction can be sharp, the global oil market’s somewhat tempered response is partly supported by current inventory levels. OECD crude and product stocks around 50 MMbbl above the five-year average, with about 40 MMbbl recently added to floating storage. However, the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) remains significantly below its historical levels, down roughly 200 MMbbl from 2018. This buffer helps offset some supply risk, but not all.

The increased transit risk and insurance costs associated with the current tensions are already driving up oil time spreads, particularly at the front of the curve. Asian importers, including China, which recorded a record 13 MMbbl/d in December, may be increasing precautionary stock builds, further tightening prompt markets and amplifying volatility.

Global Gas Markets Face New Pressures

The global energy market volatility implications extend beyond crude oil. The closure of QatarEnergy’s LNG facilities impacts 10-11 Bcf/d, about 20% of global LNG trade, and presents a significant challenge. The historically inelastic nature of LNG supply means that immediate market adjustments are likely to manifest through price rather than volume. Indeed, the JKM benchmark has already seen a sharp increase, reaching $20.01/MMBtu. This situation draws parallels to 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine cut gas flows and drove TTF prices to about $40/MMBtu, underscoring how sensitive global gas markets are to multi-Bcf/d supply disruptions. International gas inventories, unlike crude, are below their five-year norms, leaving less room for market participants to absorb such a shock.

U.S. Domestic Gas Markets and Producer Outlook

Closer to home, U.S. domestic gas markets could experience significant price movements. Henry Hub prices may see substantial increases, mirroring the response observed during the Russian supply shock. In the short term, this would translate into expanded margins and stronger cash flows for existing U.S. gas producers. However, a sustained period of higher prices could eventually incentivize increased supply activity, potentially weighing on long-term demand fundamentals.  

Iran’s Instability and China’s Energy Security

Iran’s role as a significant crude producer, accounting for roughly 4 MMbbl/d, means that political transitions introduce considerable supply risk. While economic incentives may encourage continued output, the certainty of supply is diminished. A regime shift in Iran could directly impact China’s marginal energy import costs, potentially accelerating its strategic push for greater energy security through diversification and domestic investment. 

Conclusion

The geopolitical landscape surrounding Iran presents a complex and dynamic challenge for global energy markets. While historical patterns suggest price surges may be temporary, the scale of potential disruptions to critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz and key export infrastructure cannot be underestimated. Businesses and policymakers must monitor inventory levels, OPEC’s response and evolving demand from major importers like China. Understanding these interconnected factors is crucial for navigating the inherent volatility and ensuring a stable energy future.

Key Takeaways

What is the potential impact of disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz and Kharg Island on global oil prices?

Disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 14 MMbbl/d of crude, could lead to significant price surges. A month-long closure could push Brent crude into triple digits. Damage to Kharg Island, affecting ~2.0 MMbbl/d of Iranian exports, could add $10-$15/bbl to our 2026 forecast if offline for a year.

How do historical trends and current market conditions influence oil price volatility following geopolitical events?

Historically, conflict-driven price spikes tend to fade within months as governments and producers intervene. While OPEC has signaled incremental production increases, current global gas inventories are below normal and U.S. SPR levels are lower than in previous years, potentially limiting buffers against sustained volatility.

Beyond crude oil, how do geopolitical tensions in Iran affect global natural gas markets and China’s energy strategy?

Potential disruptions to LNG supply, such as from QatarEnergy, can significantly impact global gas prices like JKM, which has already seen a sharp rise. For China, Iran’s energy instability may reinforce its drive for greater energy security through diversification and domestic investment.

About Enverus Intelligence® | Research

Enverus Intelligence® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations, and macro-economic forecasts and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies, and capital providers worldwide. See additional disclosures here.

Enverus Press Release - Undo the queue: Enverus acquires Pearl Street Technologies to solve for a more reliable, resilient grid

Should Oilfield Service Companies Join the BTM Power Markets?

Oilfield service companies have seen this pattern before: a new growth opportunity emerges, capital flows and early movers reshape their business models. You’ve lived through the shale revolution, through consolidation waves, through efficiency cycles. Some pivots worked. Some didn’t. What makes this moment different is the structural shift in electricity demand. 

Data center power consumption is accelerating at a pace regional grids were not designed to accommodate. AI-driven workloads are pushing load forecasts higher. Developers are securing gigawatts of capacity at a time. Interconnection timelines are stretching into years in some markets. Behind-the-meter (BTM) generation is increasingly being discussed not as a workaround, but as part of the broader supply solution. 

For OFS executives, the strategic question is straightforward: Does data center power represent a viable business opportunity or is it a capital-intensive distraction? 

The Structural Drivers Behind the Opportunity 

The underlying demand trends are difficult to ignore. Analysts project nearly 29 GW of additional data center load growth through 2028, with a meaningful portion of incremental demand will be met through BTM solutions. Announced BTM capacity has already surpassed 6 GW as developers explore supplemental generation where grid buildout lags demand. 

At the same time, transmission development remains slow and interconnection queues remain lengthy. Hyperscalers are under pressure to bring capacity online quickly, often in markets where utility infrastructure cannot immediately respond. 

That mismatch between load growth and grid readiness creates potential openings for supplemental power providers. 

And if you run an oilfield service business, the operational side of this probably feels familiar. Pressure pumpers already manage large generator fleets. Rental companies deploy mobile power into remote locations. Coordinating fuel, logistics and high-load operations isn’t new.  

Market Signals: Capital Is Already Moving 

Beyond projected demand growth, equity markets are beginning to reflect this shift. Recent performance data shows that OFS companies with visible power exposure have outperformed peers without power-linked revenue streams. Investors appear to be assigning higher multiples to businesses with infrastructure-style earnings tied to data center demand. This suggests capital markets view power exposure as strategically meaningful. 

Figure 1: EV/Forward EBITDA Multiple Response to Power Announcements 

Source | Enverus Intelligence® Research, Factset

Why This Isn’t a Simple Extension of Oilfield Services 

Despite the synergies, data center power operates under different economic and operational constraints than traditional oilfield services. Oilfield services reward flexibility and speed. Contracts often turn quickly. Cycles compress and expand. 

Data center power requires longer visibility. It demands alignment across fuel access, interconnections, contractual commitments and construction timelines. Capital commitments are typically larger and project miscalculations can result in underutilized equipment or long-duration exposure to markets that evolve differently than expected. 

It is also unlikely that every OFS segment will be equally positioned to compete. Pressure pumping companies may have a more natural pathway into larger-scale deployments due to generator scale and operational expertise. Smaller rental businesses might find success in shorter-term bridging opportunities. Others may find that meaningful participation requires a level of specialization and capital intensity that does not align with their core model. 

How Some Companies Are Approaching the Shift 

A handful of oilfield service companies have already begun carving out dedicated power divisions, leveraging existing generator fleets and operational expertise. Others are experimenting more cautiously, screening projects region by region, prioritizing markets where grid constraints are persistent rather than temporary. What’s notable is that few are making sweeping, company-wide pivots. Instead, most are treating data center power as an extension of capability, not a replacement for their core business. 

A More Strategic Way to Approach the Market

Rather than framing the decision as “enter or don’t enter”, it may be more productive to treat this as a validation phase. This includes: 

  • Monitoring where large-load demand is emerging 
  • Assessing where grid constraints are structural rather than cyclical 
  • Confirming fuel and infrastructure alignment at the project level 
  • Evaluating competitive saturation in targeted regions 
  • Piloting opportunities before scaling capital commitments 

The distinction between market excitement and investable opportunity often lies in project-level feasibility. For some, behind-the-meter power may become a durable extension of their platform. For others, it may prove capital-intensive and operationally complex. As with previous cycles, success will likely depend less on speed and more on discipline to understand where existing capabilities intersect with demand and the right project economics. And as this market evolves, the companies that stay closest to the data and the fundamentals will be the ones best positioned to make the right call. 

About Enverus Intelligence® | Research

Enverus Intelligence® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations, and macro-economic forecasts and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies, and capital providers worldwide. See additional disclosures here.

Global energy markets brace for supply shock and further price gains

Global energy markets brace for supply shock and further price gains

CALGARY, Alberta (Mar. 3, 2026) — Enverus Intelligence® Research (EIR), a subsidiary of Enverus, the leading energy data analytics platform, has released a new analysis examining the energy market implications of U.S. military strikes on Iran, warning that risks to oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains have increased meaningfully and could drive sharp price volatility if disruptions persist.

EIR estimates that a geopolitical risk premium of roughly $10 to $15 per barrel is currently embedded in oil prices, though that premium may understate the scale of potential disruption should transit through the Strait of Hormuz be materially impaired. Approximately 14 million barrels per day of crude oil, roughly one-third of global seaborne supply, along with about 20 percent of global LNG volumes, transit the strait.

“A prolonged disruption to the Strait of Hormuz would represent a significant macroeconomic shock and rapidly tighten energy balances, while raising the risk of recession,” said Al Salazar, head of macro research at EIR. “A one-month closure alone would draw an estimated 400 million barrels from global inventories, quickly erasing today’s modest surplus and pushing prices materially higher as importers move to secure supply.”

In its research, EIR also noted heightened uncertainty surrounding Iranian crude exports following reported damage to Kharg Island, which could place roughly 2 million barrels per day of supply at risk. If Kharg Island were offline for an extended period, this could add an additional $10 to $15 per barrel to its current 2026 Brent crude price forecast of $63 per barrel, EIR estimates.

Natural gas markets have already begun reacting to the increased risk. QatarEnergy-related LNG disruptions affect an estimated 10 to 11 Bcf per day, or about 20 percent of global LNG trade. Given the limited short-term supply elasticity in LNG markets, EIR expects price, rather than volume, to absorb much of the initial adjustment. Japan-Korea Marker prices nearly doubled following the announcement, underscoring the sensitivity of global gas markets to multi-Bcf-per-day supply shocks.

Key takeaways:

  • Oil markets face asymmetric upside risk as even a short-lived disruption to Hormuz transit would rapidly draw down inventories and could push Brent prices into triple-digit territory if importers engage in precautionary stockpiling.
  • Global LNG supply is particularly exposed, with Qatar-linked volumes representing roughly one-fifth of global trade. Historical precedent suggests price responses could be swift and severe when large volumes are removed from the market.
  • U.S. natural gas prices could move materially higher in response to global LNG tightness, benefiting producers in the near term but potentially incentivizing increased drilling activity over time, particularly in the Haynesville shale.
  • Current oil inventory buffers exist, with OECD crude and product stocks above the five-year average. However, the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve is roughly 200 million barrels below 2018 levels, leaving less margin for sustained disruption.
  • Geopolitical price spikes have historically proven temporary, though near-term volatility is likely to increase as insurance costs rise, time spreads widen, and Asian importers move to secure prompt supply.

You must be an Enverus Intelligence® subscriber to access this report.

EIR research reports cannot be distributed to members of the media without a scheduled interview. If you have questions or are interested in obtaining a copy of this report, please use our Request Media Interview button to schedule an interview with one of our expert analysts.

About Enverus Intelligence® Research
Enverus Intelligence ® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations and macro-economic forecasts; and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies and capital providers worldwide. Enverus is the most trusted, energy-dedicated SaaS company, with a platform built to create value from generative AI, offering real-time access to analytics, insights and benchmark cost and revenue data sourced from our partnerships to 95% of U.S. energy producers, and more than 40,000 suppliers. Learn more at Enverus.com.

Enverus Press Release - Class VI wave expected to hit US

The Week in Energy – March 3, 2026

This week’s energy headlines spotlight supermajor performance gains, onshore efficiency improvements, Canadian SAGD expansion, rising LNG-driven midstream buildout, and continued offshore momentum. Here are five stories that stood out:

Top Stories 

  • BP reports strong 2025 execution toward 3-year targets 
    BP reported ahead-of-schedule progress on cost reductions, upstream execution and cash flow growth, supported by high reliability across its global portfolio. A disciplined capital program continues to underpin long-term deleveraging and stable production. 

  • Oxy chasing more savings in 2026 after hitting record output 
    Occidental posted record production while lowering well costs across its U.S. onshore business. The company expects more savings in 2026 through improved design, longer laterals, and ongoing optimization across its Permian and Rockies programs. 

  • ConocoPhillips brings 104W A online at Surmont, eyes 2027 growth 
    ConocoPhillips brought a new steam-assisted gravity drainage pad online ahead of schedule at Surmont in Alberta. The project remains a key element of the company’s long-term growth plan, with additional pads supporting rising output into 2027. 

  • Whistler JV doubles down on Rio Grande feed gas with Bay Runner 
    The Bay Runner pipeline extension will deliver feed gas to Rio Grande LNG, expanding connectivity between the Permian Basin and the Gulf Coast. The project advances as LNG demand continues to strengthen globally. 

  • Permian G&P firm Kinetik for sale after Western offer, per FT 
    Kinetik is reportedly exploring strategic alternatives after receiving an unsolicited proposal, the Financial Times reported, underscoring consolidation interest in the Delaware Basin’s gas gathering and processing sector.  
Multi-Segment - 2026 Is Already in Motion - Promotional Banner

Additional Stories

Also this week: Cheniere celebrated a decade of Lower 48 LNG exports, NOV raised its quarterly dividend, Tidewater expanded its offshore fleet in Brazil, Helmerich & Payne’s Turan JV secured a major BP contract renewal, and Dominion Energy advanced its Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project toward first power. 

To learn more, reach out to businessdevelopment@enverus.com or visit www.enverus.com

Enverus Press Release - Heightened natural gas price volatility expected amid supply and demand challenges

Clean Fuels Fundamentals: The Reckoning Phase

Revenue stacks by fuel type 2025 - 2027.

The clean fuels story has turned a corner. Enverus Intelligence® Research (EIR)’s 2026 Clean Fuels Fundamentals finds an industry in recalibration: credit exposure, policy clarity and margin durability have replaced breakneck expansion as the sector’s defining priorities. Policy is clearer than in recent years, but Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) decisions for 2026-27 remain unresolved, which is no small matter when Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) drive the majority of fuel revenue, and tighter feedstock restrictions are squeezing margins (Figure 1). With capacity expected to expand at a far more modest pace through 2030, developers and investors alike are scrutinizing low-carbon projects for margin resilience and policy compatibility.

The shift is visible on balance sheets and in project pipelines. ExxonMobil trimmed low-carbon spending in late 2025, a clear signal that undifferentiated clean fuels exposure no longer pencils out. But capital hasn’t disappeared – it’s concentrating around platforms with durable offtake who know how to capitalize on credits. Recently, LanzaJet advanced a $650 million equity raise to scale its alcohol-to-jet platform and Syzygy Plasmonics locked in a six-year Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) deal with Trafigura earlier in the year. The bottom line: this is a margin management phase for clean fuels, where execution, policy fluency and disciplined capital deployment will separate leaders from the rest.

This blog offers just a glimpse of the powerful analysis Energy Transition Research delivers on the trending themes, don’t miss the full picture.

Used cooking oil has gone from a waste disposal problem, with restaurants paying to have it removed, to one of the most sought-after feedstocks in the clean fuels supply chain. 

Key Takeaways

Is the clean fuels industry moving from growth to discipline?

The sector is no longer focused on rapid expansion. Instead, companies are prioritizing margin management, credit exposure, and policy risk. Slower capacity growth through 2030 reflects a more cautious approach as feedstock constraints and unresolved RVO decisions pressure profitability.

Why does policy uncertainty still matter so much?

While policy is clearer than in recent years, key decisions for 2026–27 remain unresolved. Because RINs drive most clean fuel revenue, this uncertainty directly affects project economics and investor confidence.

Where is capital still flowing in clean fuels?

Investment has not disappeared, but it has become more selective. Capital is concentrating on projects with durable margins, strong offtake agreements, and teams that understand how to maximize credits. This phase rewards strong execution and disciplined capital deployment over undifferentiated growth.

About Enverus Intelligence® | Research

Enverus Intelligence® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations, and macro-economic forecasts and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies, and capital providers worldwide. See additional disclosures here.

Enverus Intelligence® Research Press Release - Canada’s Montney and Duverney: North America’s most abundant unconventional resource plays

Navigating Alberta’s Oil Volatility: Strategies for Economic Stability

Unlock real-time, actionable energy insights. This blog offers just a glimpse of the powerful analysis Oil & Gas Research delivers on today’s energy markets. Don’t miss the full picture. Click here to learn more.

Alberta’s economy frequently grapples with the inherent volatility of oil prices, a challenge that can significantly impact provincial coffers and lead to substantial deficits. With tomorrow’s provincial budget looming, the discussions around oil revenue downturns, deficit spending and increasing debt are more critical than ever. Our team at Enverus Intelligence® Research (EIR) consistently analyzes these dynamics, providing insights into how economies dependent on oil can better manage price fluctuations. This piece explores potential strategies, drawing lessons from international approaches and considering their applicability to Alberta. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for fostering long-term fiscal resilience and mitigating the effects of an unpredictable global energy market. We aim to shed light on proactive measures that could stabilize revenue streams and protect against future shocks. 

Alberta’s Deep Reliance on Oil Prices

Alberta’s financial health is acutely tied to the price of oil. Government disclosures indicate that every dollar change in the price of WTI shifts the province’s revenue by roughly $750 million, highlighting the vulnerability of the provincial budget to market swings. Based on an average WTI price of $61 per barrel, the province was forecasting a deficit of about $6 billion. Beyond WTI, Alberta’s revenue is also influenced by foreign exchange rates and the quality differential, the discount applied to Canadian heavy  crude because it provides less valuable amounts of refined products. These three factors collectively determine the province’s financial outlook, with WTI prices ranking as the No. 1 driver.

Trade the facts, not the noise

Get energy fundamentals, price drivers and risk signals in your inbox bi-monthly.

Learning from the Hacienda Hedge: A Proactive Approach to Alberta Oil Volatility

To mitigate oil price volatility, other oil-producing nations have implemented innovative strategies. Mexico employs a program known as the Hacienda hedge, which involves hedging 10% to 20% of the country’s annual oil production, roughly 200,000 to 300,000 barrels per day. This strategy entails purchasing insurance to guarantee a minimum oil price, often around $75 per barrel, at an annual cost of $1 billion to $2 billion. This approach proved highly effective during periods of low oil prices, such as the financial crisis of 2008-09, COVID-19 in 2020 and the Shale War in 2015-16, providing substantial payouts and insulating the economy from severe shocks. 

Could Alberta adopt a similar strategy, perhaps dubbed the “Rocky Mountain Hedge?” While certainly feasible, the optics present a challenge. Public perception often views such insurance as “gambling with taxpayers’ money,” and the cost, though a fraction of a potential $6 billion deficit, can be politically unpopular. Nobody likes paying for insurance, especially when the benefits are not immediately visible. 

Exploring Other Hedging Instruments

Beyond a direct hedging program, other financial instruments could offer protection. A “collar” is one such option, designed to ensure a floor price, say $75, while also setting a maximum price, such as $100. This means that any price above the maximum would go to the financial institution providing the insurance, effectively capping the province’s upside. The main pitfall is the potential for public outcry if oil prices spike and the province forfeits significant revenue. Headlines might declare that the province “wrote off X amount of dollars” by using such an instrument. Implementing these tools requires a robust public education campaign to explain that the goal is not to maximize profits but to ensure stable revenue flow and protect against volatility. 

Volatile Path Ahead - Venezuelan Promotional Banner

Current Market Dynamics and Future Outlook

Currently, WTI prices are around $66.25 per barrel, exceeding the $61 budget forecast. While this might suggest an overreaction to the deficit, our forecasts indicate prices could weaken as we progress through Q2. Recent geopolitical events and supply disruptions, such as the 20-million-barrel outage in Kazakhstan and the 7-million-barrel supply reduction from winter storms in the Lower 48, temporarily tightened the market. In addition, tensions between Iran and the U.S. have introduced  a geopolitical premium. However, we anticipate these factors to be transient. The worst-case scenario of extremely low prices has been averted for now, but sustained high prices are not guaranteed. 

Recommendations for Alberta’s Fiscal Management 

When considering strategies for managing Alberta’s oil volatility, two primary recommendations stand out. First, strengthening the province’s sovereign wealth fund is paramount. This “savings bank” represents prudent fiscal management and, while challenging during a deficit, is crucial for long-term stability. The province has promised a $2.8 billion deposit this year, which is a positive step. Second, exploring the potential for a hedging program similar to Mexico’s warrants serious consideration. This could involve putting the idea to a referendum, allowing Albertans to decide if they are willing to pay for insurance to protect against oil price shocks. 

The Bridger Expansion: A Glimmer of Pipeline Opportunity 

Aside fiscal strategies, infrastructure development plays a vital role in market access and revenue optimization. A proposal known as the Bridger expansion seeks to utilize the potential that Keystone XL promised on the Alberta side of the border. This is not a resurrection of the entire Keystone XL project south of the border. Instead, it’s an expansion/creation of a new line that would increase the capacity to ship Alberta oil production to Guernsey, Wyoming. Guernsey is a major trading hub for Rockies oil production and has the potential to access Gulf Coast refineries. Incremental capacity outside of Alberta makes economic sense to producers, supporting growth and market reach of Wyoming. This project will be an important development to watch in the coming months. 

Conclusion

Alberta’s dependence on oil revenue necessitates proactive and strategic fiscal management to navigate the inherent volatility of global energy markets. While challenges like public perception exist, lessons from successful hedging programs and the continued development of critical infrastructure offer pathways to greater economic stability. By combining prudent savings with innovative risk management tools and enhanced market access, Alberta can build a more resilient financial future and ensure a stable revenue flow regardless of oil price fluctuations. We believe that a balanced approach, considering both established and novel strategies, is key to sustained prosperity. 

Key Takeaways

How dependent is Alberta’s revenue on oil prices?

Alberta’s revenue changes by about $750 million for every dollar fluctuation in WTI prices.

What is a potential strategy Alberta could adopt from other oil-producing nations?

Alberta could explore a hedging program similar to Mexico’s Hacienda hedge, which provides insurance against low oil prices.

What is the significance of the Bridger expansion pipeline proposal?

The Bridger expansion offers incremental pipeline capacity for Canadian producers, providing economic access to Gulf Coast refineries.

This blog post is based on an episode from the Calgary Eyeopener radio series, hosted by Loren McGinnis, featuring an interview with Al Salazar. You can check out the full episode here

About Enverus Intelligence®| Research

Enverus Intelligence® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations, and macro-economic forecasts and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies, and capital providers worldwide. See additional disclosures here.

RatedPower publishes 2026 Global Renewable Energy Trends Report as AI, storage, and grid

RatedPower publishes 2026 Global Renewable Energy Trends Report as AI, storage, and grid constraints redefine market dynamics

MADRID, Spain (Feb. 26, 2026) — RatedPower, part of Enverus, the leading energy data analytics platform, announced that it has released its 2026 Global Renewable Energy Trends Report, offering a data-driven assessment of how renewable energy markets are evolving under accelerating deployment, rising electricity demand, and growing system constraints.

The 2026 edition combines insights from over 100 energy professionals globally with real-world data from more than 64,000 projects designed on the RatedPower platform, representing over 5.1 TW of simulated capacity.

Global momentum remains strong. In 2025 alone, renewable additions reached 793 GW, with solar PV accounting for 83% of new capacity. For the first time, renewables surpassed coal in global electricity generation, marking a structural turning point for the energy system. Looking ahead, the International Energy Agency projects 4,600 GW of new renewable capacity between 2025 and 2030, nearly double the pace of the previous five-year period.

Despite this growth, survey results show mounting pressure on infrastructure and markets. While respondents rate their confidence in the sector’s long-term outlook at an average of 4.4 out of 5, grid saturation and instability (63.7%) and permitting and regulation (47.8%) remain the most cited barriers to progress. Importantly, grid-related concerns have persisted at elevated levels for four consecutive years, underscoring that congestion and curtailment are becoming structural rather than temporary challenges in high-penetration regions.

The report highlights a sharp rise in market volatility. Negative power prices, once limited to isolated periods, are now emerging as a recurring feature in parts of Europe, Australia, and Latin America, driven by rapid solar buildout and limited system flexibility. Respondents consistently point to energy storage, flexible dispatch, and smarter grid coordination as the most effective levers to preserve project economics under these conditions.

Technology and design practices are already shifting in response. RatedPower platform data confirms that bifacial modules dominate more than 90% of simulated projects, while string inverters now account for over 60% of simulations, reflecting their growing role in modular, grid-responsive designs. Hybrid solar-plus-storage projects have accelerated sharply, rising from 12% of simulations in 2024 to 20% by Q4 2025, with AC-coupled BESS preferred in 83% of cases. The standalone BESS feature, launched on the RatedPower platform just over a year ago, now represents 3% of total simulations, signaling growing commercial interest beyond collocated projects.

Digitalization is emerging as a defining trend. 55% of surveyed professionals already use advanced digital tools to support permitting and site feasibility, while 56% leverage drone imagery and LiDAR in early-stage design. Respondents identified AI-driven optimization, forecasting, and predictive maintenance as the technologies most likely to transform renewables over the next five years, particularly as electricity demand rises from electrification and data center expansion. Commenting on this shift, Diego Lobo Guerrero Rodriguez, Iqony Renewables GmbH, said in the report: “AI is on the rise, and the massive energy requirements of data centers will be driving the expansion of renewable energies in the next decade.

Regionally, survey respondents continued to highlight China, the United States, India, Australia, and Saudi Arabia as the markets with the strongest growth potential. Europe remains a global leader in renewable penetration, but faces intensifying challenges from curtailment, grid congestion, and negative pricing. Emerging markets in Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia are increasingly positioning solar plus storage as a cornerstone of grid stability and energy access, with storage markets expected to more than double globally by 2030.

About Enverus
Enverus is the energy industry’s most trusted source for decision intelligence and operational efficiencies. With petabytes of proprietary data, deep domain expertise and AI-native technology, Enverus empowers customers to invest smarter, operate more efficiently, and scale faster — across upstream, midstream, minerals, power and renewables — all while navigating the most complex energy market in history. Learn more at Enverus.com.

About RatedPower
RatedPower helps companies discover the smartest ways to design and engineer utility-scale solar PV plants and maximize their potential through their software to automate and optimize the study, analysis, design, and engineering of photovoltaic plants and their electrical infrastructure in all its stages. RatedPower has helped design more than 5.1 TW in more than 160 countries. Bringing value to developers, IPPs, contractors, investors, and manufacturers, helping them make better decisions, democratizing engineering knowledge, and boosting the deployment of solar plants worldwide. Learn more at RatedPower.com.

Fast‑track interconnection could lift U.S. power market reserve margins to 24% by 2030

Fast‑track interconnection could lift U.S. power market reserve margins to 24% by 2030

CALGARY, Alberta (Feb. 25, 2026) Enverus Intelligence® Research (EIR), a subsidiary of Enverus, the most trusted energy‑dedicated SaaS company that leverages generative AI across its solutions, released a new analysis examining how recently approved fast-track interconnection processes are reshaping U.S. power market reliability across the PJM, Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) and Southwest Power Pool (SPP) regions through 2030.

EIR finds that accelerated interconnection programs could significantly improve regional reserve margins by 2030, moving all three markets toward stronger supply conditions while increasing the risk of oversupply, particularly if projected electricity load growth falls short of forecasts. Natural gas generation accounts for the majority of fast-tracked capacity additions, comprising roughly 69 percent of cleared resources in PJM and 75 percent in MISO.

“Fast-track interconnection processes are meaningfully improving the grid reliability outlook across several U.S. power markets, but they also raise important questions around long-term market balance,” said Juan Arteaga, associate at EIR.

“If load growth underperforms expectations while firm generation continues moving through accelerated interconnection queues, some regions could shift from capacity shortfalls to oversupply within the decade.”

Key takeaways

  • Accelerated interconnection initiatives could lift 2030 reserve margins to approximately 20 percent in PJM, well above today’s levels, if all fast-tracked resources are delivered.
  • MISO’s reserve margin is projected to improve to 11 percent by 2030, with additional gains possible as future expedited resource cycles move forward.
  • SPP could shift from an undersupplied power market to oversupplied, with fast-tracked capacity raising its 2030 reserve margin to an estimated 19 percent to 24 percent.
  • Natural gas dominates fast-tracked generation additions, representing roughly 69 percent in PJM and 75 percent in MISO, reinforcing its role in near-term reliability.
  • Improved power supply conditions are expected to reduce energy market volatility, creating new challenges for battery storage economics and existing peaker plants as markets become less constrained.
Enverus Intelligence Bar Chart: PJM, MISO and SPP Reserve Margins

EIR’s analysis leverages proprietary data and modeling and draws from a variety of products including Enverus PRISM® and Enverus AI

You must be an Enverus Intelligence® subscriber to access this report.

EIR research reports cannot be distributed to members of the media without a scheduled interview. If you have questions or are interested in obtaining a copy of this report, please use our Request Media Interview button to schedule an interview with one of our expert analysts.

About Enverus Intelligence® Research
Enverus Intelligence ® | Research, Inc. (EIR) is a subsidiary of Enverus that publishes energy-sector research focused on the oil, natural gas, power and renewable industries. EIR publishes reports including asset and company valuations, resource assessments, technical evaluations and macro-economic forecasts; and helps make intelligent connections for energy industry participants, service companies and capital providers worldwide. Enverus is the most trusted, energy-dedicated SaaS company, with a platform built to create value from generative AI, offering real-time access to analytics, insights and benchmark cost and revenue data sourced from our partnerships to 95% of U.S. energy producers, and more than 40,000 suppliers. Learn more at Enverus.com.

U.S. oil and gas M&A slumps as low crude prices keep buyers in the dugout

Why the Best AP Platforms Are Moving Upstream into Source-to-Pay 

Accounts Payable in oil and gas has never been more important. AP teams are under increasing pressure to reduce disputes, close faster, improve accuracy, and provide confidence in spend. Many organizations have invested heavily in AP automation and process improvement, and those efforts are paying off. Finance teams feel the impact of late visibility more than anyone, and once spend reaches AP, the opportunity to influence outcomes is already gone. 

And yet, even with a strong AP function, familiar challenges remain. Price mismatches still appear. Invoices arrive for work that was never approved. Budget surprises surface late in the month when there is little time to react. AP teams often find themselves resolving issues they did not create, while finance leaders wonder why predictability still feels elusive. 

If this sounds familiar, it is not a failure of AP. In many cases, it is the opposite. Strong AP performance tends to expose a deeper truth about how spend actually works. 

Key takeaways:

Why do AP teams still experience mismatches and surprises even when they perform well? 

  • Because invoices reflect decisions made far upstream, AP often uncovers issues it had no opportunity to prevent. 

What makes invoices unreliable as an early indicator of financial risk? 

  • Invoices are lagging indicators that surface problems only after pricing, ordering, and field execution choices have already created them. 

Why are leading finance teams shifting their focus further upstream into SourcetoPay? 

  • Finance gains control and predictability when pricing, orders, execution, and invoicing operate in a connected S2P system that prevents issues instead of reacting to them. 
Invoices tell you what happened. Source-to-Pay shows you why — and gives finance a chance to act sooner. 

Invoices Are Lagging Indicators

An invoice is the final record of a long chain of decisions. Long before it reaches AP, choices have already been made about which suppliers to use, what pricing applies, what was ordered, and what work or materials were delivered in the field. 

When an invoice arrives with a price mismatch, it usually points back to a pricing agreement that was unclear or not consistently enforced. When AP flags unapproved work, the issue often started with an order that never went through a proper approval workflow. When finance sees a budget overrun, the root cause typically lives weeks or months upstream. 

By the time AP is involved, the opportunity to prevent the issue has already passed. AP can correct, reconcile, and resolve, but it cannot change the upstream decisions that created the problem. 

This is why invoices are best understood as lagging indicators. They show what happened, not why it happened. Because invoices arrive after commitments are already made, they force finance to operate with reactive forecasting and late accrual adjustments that reduce confidence in monthly results. 

Why AP Automation Excellence Naturally Pulls Finance Upstream

As AP processes become more accurate and efficient, finance leaders begin asking different questions. 

  • Why does this invoice not match agreed pricing? 
  • Why was this work not approved before it happened? 
  • Why did spend exceed expectations despite existing controls? 

Those questions rarely have answers inside the invoice itself. They lead upstream into pricing agreements, ordering workflows, and execution visibility. They also highlight a simple reality. If finance wants fewer surprises, control has to start earlier. 

This is why many of the strongest AP platforms evolve into broader source-to-pay platforms. Not because AP is no longer critical, but because AP success makes upstream gaps impossible to ignore. As AP strengthens, it exposes the limits of working only at the end of the process. Finance leaders see quickly that they cannot control spend, improve forecasts, or prevent variance without visibility into the commitments being made earlier.

Source-to-Pay as a Financial Control System

Source-to-pay is often misunderstood as procurement software. In practice, it functions as a financial control system that spans the full lifecycle of spend. 

At a high level, that lifecycle includes pricing agreements, ordering, execution and work verification, invoicing, and ultimately settlement. When these steps are connected, finance gains something AP alone cannot provide. Predictability. 

Instead of discovering issues at invoice time, teams can prevent them earlier. Pricing is enforced through orders. Work is approved before it begins. Execution is verified before invoices arrive. Disputes decline because expectations are aligned upfront. 

For finance leaders, the value extends beyond efficiency. It is about confidence in budgets, forecasts, and outcomes. When all stages of spend follow one connected path, the financial picture becomes clearer and more stable, giving finance a level of control that AP alone cannot deliver. 

Why Spend Control Matters in Energy and Field Driven Operations

These challenges are amplified in industries with complex, field driven operations. In energy, spend is often tied to services and materials executed across distributed locations. Work happens quickly, conditions change, and generic indirect spend tools struggle to reflect operational reality. 

Price mismatches, unapproved work, and budget surprises are rarely the result of bad intent. More often, they stem from disconnected systems and limited execution visibility. Finance teams need platforms that reflect how work actually gets done in the field, not just how it appears on a requisition. 

Execution visibility becomes a strategic asset when pricing, orders, field activity, and invoices are connected. Teams spend less time resolving disputes and more time managing outcomes. Unapproved work becomes unplanned accruals, inconsistent pricing drives cost variance, and delayed visibility disrupts cash forecasting and budget tracking. These consequences make connected execution especially important for finance leaders in energy operations. 

AP Is the Foundation, Not the Finish Line

Best in class AP is something to build on, not move away from. It provides the trust, accuracy, and discipline that make upstream expansion possible. 

The next step is not replacing AP. It is extending spend control earlier into the supply chain so finance can influence outcomes instead of reacting to them. Source-to-pay connects pricing, orders, execution, invoices, and eventually payments into a shared system of truth. 

At Enverus, we see this evolution consistently. Many customers begin with invoice and ticket workflows because that is where pain is most visible. Over time, they recognize that the greater opportunity lies upstream, in shaping spend before it reaches AP. 

Strong AP teams fix problems efficiently. Strong source-to-pay platforms prevent many of those problems from happening in the first place. The organizations that perform best are those that shape spend before it hits AP, giving finance the clarity and control needed for reliable budgets and stronger financial outcomes. 

Want to learn more?

Fill out the form below to speak to an expert who can explain how the Enverus Source-to-Pay platform connects pricing, orders, execution, invoices, and payments to improve control and predictability. 

Let’s get started!

We’ll follow up right away to show you a quick product tour.

Let’s get started!

We’ll follow up right away to show you a quick product tour.

Ready to Subscribe?

Ready to Get Started?

Ready to Subscribe?

Sign Up

Power Your Insights