OPEC’s oil market balancing challenge got tougher and more complex over the past two decades. The organization cut oil production in the face of the 2008 financial crisis, the surge in U.S. liquids growth and most recently the COVID-19 crisis. The scale of OPEC cuts required to balance the market through these crises has risen at the same time the collective capacity to act has diminished, as fewer major producers are able to implement planned cuts.
OPEC’s Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) core countries Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE have traditionally formed OPEC’s hard backbone in leading negotiations to deliver output cuts and then rigorously delivering cuts to help rebalance markets and keep prices stable. The cooperation of non-OPEC producers in 2016 to form the OPEC+ grouping is also important. Declining oil production levels in some member countries have unintentionally supported the balancing mission.
But this year was different. After the March flirtation with a price war, OPEC+ agreed to pull an unprecedented 10% of global oil supply in a tapered, multi-year cuts agreement. This time, Russia and other non-OPEC partners not only signed up but largely delivered. OPEC for its part achieved higher-than-usual compliance through additional cuts delivered by Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries as well as hefty political pressure by Riyadh on laggards Iraq, Nigeria and Angola.
The UAE’s breaking of ranks by missing cut targets in July and August therefore is significant. The shift by this core GCC producer undermined Saudi calls for compliance from others and opened fissures in the OPEC+ project. Given Abu Dhabi National Oil Company’s (ADNOC) plans to increase oil production capacity and potentially rising OPEC supply in 2021, ADNOC may have staked out its customer base before other OPEC producers can do so.
UAE leadership may also be reading the runes in Washington. A Biden White House will be much less inclined to twist OPEC arms as Trump did in March. Biden will also establish a more nuanced and balanced approach to both Saudi Arabia and its regional nemesis Iran. Amidst these age-old rivalries, the UAE’s peace deal with Israel has made it a favored regional player, able to play all sides. A more independent oil policy may be part of this transformation.
RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:
© Copyright 2020 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.
All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material. To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.
Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:
This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “see,” “will,” “would,” or “target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.
These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.
Note to UK Persons:
RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person. You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being ‘investment professionals’ within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”)), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being “relevant persons”). RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons. Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person (‘A’) whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person (‘B’) falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A’s responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B’s engaging in investment activity.
Latest posts by Enverus (see all)
- Ranking the Rock - November 23, 2020
- The Houston Chronicle Names Enverus Winner of Houston Top Workplaces 2020 Award - November 18, 2020
- Enverus’ Activity Analytics Provides Visibility Into Milestone, Lifecycle Moments - November 17, 2020