How leading EPCs are building smarter pipelines, reducing bid risk, and winning more projects — without adding headcount.
In this fast-moving environment, executives must position the platform where activity is going – identify the geographies, technologies, and customers most likely to scale and become the preferred partner ahead of the growth. For leaders executing on strategic initiatives, they can’t afford to be burdened with slow bids, lagging project execution, or cost overruns.
The four workflows outlined here — from strategic market positioning and business development to accelerated preliminary design — give EPCs the intelligence and tools to increase bid volume, improve win rates, and grow with confidence.
Challenge: Understanding the short and long-term market outlook to build business strategy around future project growth.
Power project opportunities follow market signals: utility Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs), policy targets, load growth forecasts, and developer activity. Without clear visibility into these signals, it’s hard to predict where future projects will be. Executives often struggle to identify geographies, technologies, and customers most likely to scale in order to position their business as the preferred partner ahead of the growth. Firms stay reactive rather than proactive. This can mean missing high-value opportunities.
Solution: Use Enverus’ power market intelligence to know “where to play” and “with whom” far ahead of your competition. This sets your business up to win in 2+ years when the next build cycle peaks.
“According to Enverus forecasts, power demand in this county is set to grow 20% by 2030, strengthening the case for your project. We can help you capitalize on that.”
Approach your customers with confident, data-driven insights and demonstrate the expertise that opens doors and inspires confidence.
Outcome: More strategic growth and higher-quality pipelines.
Deploy business development and engineering resources in markets primed for growth, grounded in data. Instead of chasing every potential project, the team focuses on markets and partners that align with growth trends — improving the operating efficiency of the business overall.
The result is a pipeline with larger, more viable projects and a reputation as an EPC that “gets” the market. By moving early, you lock in business that competitors didn’t even know was coming. Market intelligence from Enverus helps executives see around the corner – turning industry insight into true advantage ahead of the next build cycle.
Challenge: Limited line-of-sight to new projects.
EPC business development teams often rely on existing clients, word-of-mouth, or industry events to hear about upcoming opportunities. This reactive approach means valuable projects are missed, and chasing leads without data yields low hit rates — often only 10–15% of pursued deals convert to wins. In a fast-moving market, limited early visibility into developer pipelines puts EPCs at a structural disadvantage.
Without timely intelligence on project timelines and counterparty activity, teams struggle to prioritize the right opportunities or position the business competitively before RFPs hit the market.
Solution: Leverage Enverus Project Tracking for intelligent prospecting.
Enverus has the most comprehensive database with 80,000+ projects, with details on developer, technology, size, status, grid connection viability, and proprietary probability metrics. We are the only provider with decades of experience in project tracking and true enhanced project data backed by primary research. Updates are daily with news on 20-25 new projects on average.
Utilize Enverus’ proprietary project likelihood metric to evaluate and benchmark projects across all the drivers that impact the path to COD.
Outcome: Smarter, faster business development, better resource allocation on the most viable opportunities, and competitive business positioning.
An Enverus-equipped BD team can identify and qualify new projects roughly four times faster than using manual research. This efficient workflow means an EPC can grow their opportunity pipeline without a commensurate increase in BD headcount. Moreover, by focusing on the most promising projects (and tracking competitor and developer activities), the team improves its proposal win rate.
Challenge: Wasted time and resources on projects that never materialize.
The harsh reality is that most proposed power projects — up to 90% — fail to reach construction, most often due to interconnection delays or unfavorable grid economics. EPCs absorb real cost when engineers and bid resources are consumed by pursuits that never move forward. Without clear data on queue positions and network upgrade costs, it is difficult to know which projects are worth pursuing in the first place.
Solution: Qualify projects upfront with data from interconnection queues, transmission studies, and cost estimates to help EPCs assess project viability before bidding.
Outcome: Higher bid success and lower pursuit costs.
By screening opportunities, EPCs avoid sunk cost on bids destined to fail. They redirect efforts to projects with a much greater chance of moving forward. This can make an EPC’s average project win rate jump significantly (e.g. bidding on projects up to 9× more likely to be built than others).
Challenge: Slow, manual design processes force EPCs to choose between speed and accuracy.
Traditional FEED solar and battery designs using CAD or third-party engineers can take 15–30 days for a single project, delaying proposals and limiting how many RFPs an EPC can pursue. On average, 2,000+ engineering hours per year are lost to low value screening and bid work. This bottleneck hurts an EPC firm’s ability to win new business.
Solution: Fast-track the engineering workflow and quote more projects by automating project design and document generation without increasing engineering head count and allowing for engineering talent to focus on more revenue generating tasks.
Outcome: 90% faster turnaround on initial designs and more bids out the door.
What used to take 2–4 weeks of engineering can now be done in a matter of hours. This means an EPC can bid on substantially more projects without adding staff, increasing their chances of winning new contracts. Furthermore, senior engineers spend their time focused on revenue generating work, further optimizing capital and time.
The power sector’s pace of development rewards EPCs that move early and make better decisions with better information. Across these four workflows, the common thread is clear: integrating market intelligence, project data, and automated design into the pre-construction process allows leadership to allocate capital and engineering capacity more deliberately — earlier, with less risk, and at higher margin. The result is a stronger pipeline, a more selective bid strategy, and a competitive advantage ahead of the next build cycle.
Let’s get started!
Let’s get started!
We’ll follow up right away to show you a quick product tour.
Ready to Subscribe?
Ready to Get Started?
Ready to Subscribe?
Sign Up
Power Your Insights
