Energy Analytics

Southern Delaware – The Children Need Space

byEnverus

Well results in the southern Delaware Basin degraded severely in recent years. Although early parent well delineation presented enticing recoveries, as operators tightened well spacing and introduced child well drilling, meaning a second, third or even fourth well in close proximity to the original one, oil recoveries and economic returns suffered. Compared with the northern Delaware, degradation with tighter development is more severe in the southern region due to geologic differences – the highly faulted and fractured nature of the subsurface results in more intense well interference.

Figure 1 demonstrates the magnitude of this interference. Enverus identified a tightly spaced infill development where three wells were put on production at the same time (co-completed) in the Wolfcamp A, a zone commonly targeted by E&Ps, about eight months after an existing well in the section was placed on production. In this case, well interference spanned the entire development. The immediate child well is forecasted to recover 50% of the legacy producer, and the second and third wells are on track to recover 57% and 75%, respectively.

How can operators combat the high likelihood of well interference? The solution requires sacrificing inventory. Enverus analyzed a group of 11 Wolfcamp A pilots to determine that infill developments must be spaced ~1,760 feet away from legacy producers to avoid child well degradation and maximize project-level net present value. The southern Delaware undoubtedly holds challenges, but when child well drilling is avoided and wider spacing is prioritized, value can be generated for both operators and investors.

FIGURE 1 | Recoveries and Economics of a Tight Infill Development in Southern Delaware

 

RS Energy Group Disclosure Statement:

© Copyright 2020 RS Energy Group Canada, Inc. (RSEG). All rights reserved.

All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this document are proprietary to RSEG. This document should not be copied, distributed or reproduced, in whole or in part. The material presented is provided for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any securities or other financial instruments. Information contained herein has been compiled by RSEG and prepared from various public and industry sources that we believe to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made by RSEG, its affiliates or any other person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Such information is provided with the expectation that it will be viewed as part of a mosaic of analysis and should not be relied upon on a stand-alone basis. Any opinions expressed herein reflect the judgment of RSEG as of the date of this document and are subject to change at any time as new or additional data and information is received and analyzed. RSEG undertakes no duty to update this information, or to provide supplemental information to anyone viewing this material.  To the full extent provided by law, neither RSEG nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of the information contained herein. The recipient assumes all risks and liability with regard to any use or application of the data included herein.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This public communication may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. In this context, forward-looking statements often contain words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “see,” “will,” “would,” or “target” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes.

These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. When evaluating the information included in this communication, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our judgment only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

Note to UK Persons:

RSEG is not an authorised person as defined in the UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) and the content of this report has not been approved by such an authorised person.  You will accordingly not be able to rely upon most of the rules made under FSMA for the protection of clients of financial services businesses, and you will not have the benefit of the UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This document is only directed at (a) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments (being ‘investment professionals’ within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”)), and (b) High net worth companies, trusts etc of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO (all such persons being “relevant persons”).  RSEG’s services are available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. This report must not be acted or relied upon by persons who are not relevant persons.  Persons of a type described in Article 49(2) of the FPO comprise (a) any body corporate which has, or which is a member of the same group as an undertaking which has, a called up share capital or net assets of not less than ( i ) in the case of a body corporate which has more than 20 members or is a subsidiary undertaking of an undertaking which has more than 20 members, £500,000 and (ii) in any other case, £5 million, (b) any unincorporated association or partnership which has net assets of not less than £5 million, (c) the trustee of a high value trust within the meaning of Article 49(6) of the FPO and (d) any person (‘A’) whilst acting in the capacity of director, officer or employee of a person (‘B’) falling within any of (a), (b) or (c) above where A’s responsibilities, when acting in that capacity, involve him in B’s engaging in investment activity.

Enverus

Enverus

Energy’s most trusted SaaS platform — creating intelligent connections that uncover insights and opportunities to deliver extraordinary outcomes.

Subscribe to the Enverus Blog

A weekly update on the latest “no-fluff” insight and analysis of the energy industry.

Related Content

Enverus News Release - Utility growth prospects: Quantifying long and short opportunities
Analyst Takes Power and Renewables
ByRob Allerman

For much of March, the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) experienced significant fluctuations in power prices due to congestion, transmission outages and bearish pricing trends in SP-15. My team used Panorama to better understand and the Power Market Publications in...

energy-transition-group-of-professionals-meeting
Energy Transition
ByCarson Kearl

One of the most common and important questions for the power sector today is what impact artificial intelligence and the data centers needed to generate it will have on energy consumption.

taming-midstream-costs-refined-expense-accruals
Midstream
ByEnverus

Midstream is caught between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, gathering and pipeline operators, processors, storage and energy marketers face abundant opportunities and challenges when meeting customer demand.

Enverus Press Release - The surprisingly balanced global LNG market
Intelligence
ByErin Faulkner

Natural gas prices are setting up E&P companies operating in gas plays for a challenging 2024, maybe more challenging than they expected. On March 20, the 12-month strip settled at $2.71/MMBtu, down from more than $3.00/MMBtu when the year started,...

Enverus Blog - The Texas power market evolution
Power and Renewables
ByRobin Grathwohl

Available transfer capacity (ATC) refers to the remaining power transfer capability within a transmission network. It represents the maximum amount of power that can be transmitted over a transmission line without compromising grid reliability and stability.

geothermal-energy-in-the-us
Power and Renewables
ByGraham Bain

Geothermal energy in the U.S. is gaining ground, thanks to initiatives like the Enhanced Geothermal Shot which aims to reduce Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) costs 90% to $45/MWh by 2035.

available transfer capacity
Intelligence
ByJoseph Gyure, Editor, Enverus Intelligence

Day rates in the U.S. can’t seem to make up their mind, and neither can drilling contractors. All of the Enverus Day Rate Survey’s seven regions saw rig rates decline sequentially in February, for the first time since October.

gen-ai-blog
Generative AI
ByJimmy Fortuna

That’s right – the Instant Analyst technology that we announced just two weeks ago is coming to PRISM. The Intelligence Vault already has Instant Analyst features enabled for a group of trial customers, helping them get faster answers to complex questions...

energy-transition-group-of-professionals-meeting
Energy Transition
ByIvana Petrich

As the world debated the complexities of achieving net zero at last year’s COP28, regulatory pressures continued to increase in the U.S as the EPA announced its final Quad O rules aimed at sharply reducing methane emissions.

Let’s get started!

We’ll follow up right away to show you a quick product tour.

Let’s get started!

We’ll follow up right away to show you a quick product tour.

Sign up for our Blog

Register Today

Sign Up

Power Your Insights

Connect with an Expert

Access Product Tour

Speak to an Expert